People all over the country had been anticipating the decision that was made today by U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton on SB1070. Bolton prevented the implementation of two controversial elements of the bill: one which allowed police officers in Arizona to stop individuals who they believe to be undocumented and the other which would allow the state to charge individuals who failed to possess proper immigration documents. In her decision, the Judge wrote that the federal government’s effort to enforce immigration laws would be compromised with such measures like SB1070.
One of the main arguments for the bill is that each state should have the liberty to implement their own laws that deal with issues for which the federal government is not doing an adequate job of addressing. Such a statement is extremely controversial because it begs the question of: “How much control should the federal government have of each state?”
In this country, the federal government and state governments both have separate and shared responsibilities it is difficult to side with either. Our constitution mandates and sets the divisions between state and federal government therefore it imposable to demand a more central government. In theory, it would be contradictory to what a “Democratic” government should look like but maybe in my ideal America, the federal government would have more regulation of the laws that are passed by each state.
When I think of some of the most controversial and sensitive propositions that have been passed in California like Proposition 209, 227, and 187, I cannot help but think about all the negative repercussions on our immigrant population. I value the importance behind having individuals vote on matters they care about but what if the issues they are voting on effect a group of people who does not have the right to vote? It is a fact that so long as you are not a citizen of this country you do not have the right to vote but I struggle with processing how the fates of these individuals are left in the hand of people who do not understand their circumstances and many times do not care to learn about them.
Not only does SB1070 deal with a national matter but it sets the premise for other states to follow such discriminatory steps. It is causing as much confusion, debate and conflict like many propositions have in California. The key question is, will the bill be found unconstitutional?
Agueda
It's time for our annual campaign drive! Partner with us to mentor our youth from the threats of gang violence, drugs, and dropping out of school. Everyone who donates will be entered to win two tickets to our benefit concert with Jackson Browne in October.
YOUR DONATION WILL CHANGE LIVES! Donate here: Youth Mentoring Connection Annual Campaign